1
2
3
4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
6
7 KENNETH RAY BALLARD, Case No. 25-cv-08139-NW
8 Plaintiff,
ORDER SCREENING COMPLAINT,
9 v. DISMISSING WITH PREJUDICE, AND
DENYING PENDING MOTIONS
10 FORTINO, et al.,
Re: ECF No. 2
Defendants.
11
12
13 Plaintiff Kenneth Ray Ballard, a state detainee, filed a pro se civil rights complaint under
14 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and a motion to proceed in forma pauperis. See ECF Nos. 1, 2. The Complaint
15 is now before the Court for screening pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). For the reasons set forth
16 below, the Court DISMISSES the Complaint with prejudice as duplicative and DENIES Ballard’s
17 motion.
18 Upon review of the Complaint, which raises claims stemming from the denial of his
19 request for pro per privileges at the Santa Clara County Jail, the Court concludes that this
20 Complaint is duplicative of Ballard’s claims in Ballard v. Santa Clara County et al., No. 25-cv-
21 05201-NW (N.D. Cal., filed Jun. 20, 2025). An in forma pauperis complaint that merely repeats
22 pending or previously litigated claims may be considered abusive under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Cato v.
23 United States, 70 F.3d 1103, 1105 n.2 (9th Cir. 1995). As a result, an in forma pauperis complaint
24 repeating the same factual allegations asserted in an earlier case—as Ballard has filed here—is
25 subject to dismissal as abusive and duplicative. Bailey v. Johnson, 846 F.2d 1019, 1021 (5th Cir.
26 1988). Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED with prejudice as duplicative of the claims and
27 allegations raised in his earlier case.
1 application of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), which will prevent him from proceeding in forma pauperis in
2 || any future civil actions or appeals unless he can show he is “under imminent danger of serious
3 || physical injury.”
4 || 1. CONCLUSION
5 The Court orders as follows:
6 1. The Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as duplicative.
7 2. Ballard’s request to proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED. See ECF No. 2.
8 3. The Clerk shall close the file.
9 IT IS SO ORDERED.
10 || Dated: March 27, 2026
1]
Noél Wise
United States District Judge
2B
«14
16
17
Oo
Z 18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.