1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 JASON HUCKER, Case No.: 25-cv-02533-RBM-BLM
CDCR # P-73941
12
ORDER:
Plaintiff,
13
vs. (1) DENYING MOTION TO
14
PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS
15 [Doc. 2];
J. HILL, Warden, et al.,
16 Defendants. (3) DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION
17 WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR
FAILURE TO PAY FILING FEES;
18
AND
19
(4) DENYING MOTION FOR
20
APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL
21 AS MOOT [Doc. 3]
22
23 Plaintiff Jason Hucker, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed a civil rights
24 Complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 along with a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis
25 (“IFP Application”) and a Motion for Appointment of Counsel. (Docs. 1–3.)
26 I. MOTION TO PROCEED IFP
27 All parties instituting any civil action, suit or proceeding in a district court of the
28 United States, except an application for writ of habeas corpus, must pay a filing fee of
1 $405, consisting of a $350 statutory fee plus an additional administrative fee of $55,
2 although the administrative fee does not apply to persons granted leave to proceed IFP.
3 See 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a) (Judicial Conference Schedule of Fees, District Court Misc. Fee
4 Schedule, § 14 (eff. Dec. 1, 2023)). The action may proceed despite a plaintiff’s failure to
5 prepay the entire fee only if he is granted leave to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
6 § 1915(a). See Andrews v. Cervantes, 493 F.3d 1047, 1051 (9th Cir. 2007). Section
7 1915(a)(2) requires prisoners seeking leave to proceed IFP to submit a “certified copy of
8 the trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for . . . the 6-month period
9 immediately preceding the filing of the complaint.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2); Andrews v.
10 King, 398 F.3d 1113, 1119 (9th Cir. 2005). From the certified trust account statement, the
11 Court assesses an initial payment of 20% of (a) the average monthly deposits in the account
12 for the past six months, or (b) the average monthly balance in the account for the past six
13 months, whichever is greater, unless the prisoner has insufficient assets. See 28 U.S.C.
14 § 1915(b)(1)&(4); Bruce v. Samuels, 577 U.S. 82, 84 (2016). Prisoners who proceed IFP
15 must pay any remaining balance in “increments” or “installments,” regardless of whether
16 their action is ultimately dismissed. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1)–(2); Bruce, 577 U.S. at 84.
17 Plaintiff’s IFP Application does not include a trust fund account statement. (See
18 Doc. 2.) The Court cannot grant his IFP Application without a trust fund account statement
19 containing financial information for the 6-month period immediately preceding the filing
20 of his Complaint. See Andrews, 398 F.3d at 1119 (“prisoners must demonstrate that they
21 are not able to pay the filing fee with an affidavit and submission of their prison trust
22 account records.”) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(1)–(2)).
23 The IFP Application (Doc. 2) is DENIED. This action is DISMISSED without
24 prejudice based on Plaintiff’s failure to pay the filing fee or to submit a properly supported
25 motion to proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a) & 1915(a), and Plaintiff’s Motion
26 for Appointment of Counsel (Doc. 3) is DENIED as moot.
27 ///
28 ///
l I. MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL
2 Since the Court must dismiss the action, Plaintiff's motion for appointment of
3 || counsel (Doc. 4) is DENIED as moot, without prejudice to Plaintiff making a renewed
4 ||request should the case be reopened and should he satisfy the criteria for discretionary
5 || appointment of counsel in a civil case.
6 It. CONCLUSION AND ORDER
7 Accordingly, the Court:
8 (1) DENIES Plaintiff's IFP Application without prejudice (Doc. 2.)
9 (2) DISMISSES this civil action without prejudice based on Plaintiff's failure to
10 the civil filing and administrative fee or to submit a properly supported motion to
11 || proceed IFP pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a) & 1915(a).
12 (3) DENIES Plaintiff's Motion for Appointment of Counsel as moot. (Doc. 3.)
13 (4) GRANTS Plaintiff until February 13, 2026 to: (a) prepay the entire $405
14 || civil filing and administrative fee in full; or (b) complete and file a properly supported
15 |} motion to proceed IFP which includes a certified copy of his prison trust account statement
16 || for the 6-month period preceding the filing of his Complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2);
17 ||S.D. Cal. CivLR 3.2(b). If Plaintiff fails to either pay the $405 civil filing fee or submit a
18 || properly supported motion to proceed IFP by February 13, 2026, this action will remain
19 || dismissed without prejudice based solely on his failure to satisfy 28 U.S.C. § 1914(a)’s fee
20 || requirement and without further Order of the Court.
21 IT IS SO ORDERED
22 ||Dated: January 28, 2026 Fe Le ; ? L é >
23 HON. RUTH BERMUDEZ MONTENEGRO
24 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
25
26
27
28
NE □□ DDAAT DTN:
Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.