Smith v. I.C. System Inc.

Docket 1:25-cv-24312

Filed
2025-09-19
Terminated
Not recorded
Case type
cv

Outcome

other dismissal

FJC civil IDB DISTRICT=3C OFFICE=1 DOCKET=2524312 FILEDATE=09/19/2025 DISP=14, PROCPROG=2, JUDGMENT=0; codebook: https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default/files/idb/codebooks/Civil%20Codebook%201988%20Forward%2010252023.pdf

Outcome source

Parties and representation

      Party and firm records are not available for this case.

      Panel

        No sourced panel votes are recorded.

        Opinions and documents

        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF FLORIDA Case No. 25-cv-24312-BLOOM/Elfenbein JOANNE SMITH, Plaintiff, v. BRENDA FOREMAN, Defendant. _________________________/ ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon Magistrate Judge Marty Fulgueira Elfenbein’s Report and Recommendation. ECF No. [6]. The matter was assigned to Magistrate Judge Elfenbein pursuant to Administrative Order 2025-11. See ECF No. [4]. The Report and Recommendation recommends that “[b]ecause the Court afforded Plaintiff the opportunity to pay the required filing fee or resubmit the Long Form for the Court’s reconsideration — warning her that failure to do so may result in dismissal — and Plaintiff has neither complied nor sought an extension of time and the time to do so has long passed” the Court exercise its inherent power to dismiss the Complaint without prejudice. ECF No. [6] at 2. The Report and Recommendation advised the parties they had “fourteen (14) days from the date of being served with a copy of th[e] Report and Recommendation within which to file written objections, if any, with the assigned United States District Judge.” Id. at 3. To date, the parties have not filed objections, nor have they sought additional time to file objections. Nonetheless, the Court has conducted a de novo review of Judge Elfenbein’s Report and Recommendation and the record and is otherwise fully advised in the premises. See Williams v. McNeil, 557 F.3d 1287, 1291 (11th Cir. 2009) (citing 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)). Upon review, the Case No. 25-cv-24312-BLOOM/Elfenbein Court finds Judge Elfenbein’s Report and Recommendation to be well reasoned and correct. The Court therefore agrees with the analysis and concludes that Plaintiff's Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Accordingly, it is ORDERED and ADJUDGED as follows: 1. The Report and Recommendation, ECF No. [6], is ADOPTED. 2. Plaintiff's Complaint, ECF No. [1], is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE. 3. All pending motions are DENIED AS MOOT. 4. The Clerk of Court shall CLOSE this case. DONE and ORDERED in Chambers in Miami, Florida, on May 13, 2026. Hb UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Copies to: Counsel of record

        Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.