Opinions and documents
1 Nikhil Shreeham Agharkar
State Bar # 247757
2
Email: fedcourt@pierrepierrelaw.com
3 Pierre Pierre Law, P.C.
180 Promenade Circle North
4
Suite 300 - #1147
5 Sacramento, California 95834
6 Telephone: (646) 992-8383
Facsimile: (718) 504-6962
7
8 Attorneys for Plaintiff:
9 Angelique Octavia Pratt
10
11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
14
15 Angelique Octavia Pratt, ) Case No.: 2:25-cv-02635-CSK
16 )
Plaintiff,
17 ) STIPULATION AND
18 ) MODIFIED [PROPOSED]
19 vs. ) ORDER FOR THE AWARD
AND PAYMENT OF
20 )
ATTORNEY FEES PURSUANT
21 )
Commissioner of Social Security, TO THE EQUAL ACCESS TO
22 ) JUSTICE ACT, 28
23 Defendant. ) U.S.C. § 2412(d), AND COSTS
) PURSUANT TO 28 U.S.C. § 1920
24
25
26
27
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by the parties, through their undersigned
28
1 attorneys, and with the approval of the Court as provided below, that Plaintiff be
2
awarded attorney fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. §
3
4 2412(d), in the amount of $11,300.00. This amount represents compensation for all
5
6 legal services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil
7
action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 1920, 2412(d).
8
9 Plaintiff was the prevailing party in this matter and Plaintiff is an individual
10
11 whose net worth does not exceed $2,000,000 at the time the civil action was filed.
12
The position of the Commissioner was not substantially justified and an award of
13
14 fees is not unjust.
15
After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government will
16
17
consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees to Plaintiff’s attorney,
18
19 Eddy Pierre Pierre, Esq.
20
Under Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S. Ct. 2521, 2528-29 (2010), EAJA fees awarded
21
22
by this Court belong to the Plaintiff and are subject to offset under the Treasury
23
24 Offset Program (31 U.S.C. § 3716(c)(3)(B) (2006)). Any EAJA fees should
25
therefore be awarded to Plaintiff and not to Plaintiff’ s attorney. Fees can be made
26
27
payable by check or electronic funds transfer (EFT).
28
1 If, after receiving the Court’ s EAJA fee order, the Commissioner (1)
2
determines that Plaintiff has assigned her right to EAJA fees to his attorney; (2)
3
4 determines that Plaintiff does not owe a debt that is subject to offset under the
5
6 Treasury Offset Program, the EAJA fees will be made payable to Plaintiff’s attorney,
7
Eddy Pierre Pierre, Esq., pursuant to Assignment. However, if there is a debt owed
8
9 under the Treasury Offset Program, the remaining EAJA fees after offset will be
10
11 paid by a check or EFT made out to Plaintiff, but delivered to Plaintiff’ s attorney,
12
Eddy Pierre Pierre, Esq., pursuant to the assignment executed by Plaintiff.
13
14 This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s request for
15
EAJA attorney fees and does not constitute an admission of liability on the part of
16
17
Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the agreed amount shall
18
19 constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and all claims that Plaintiff and/or
20
Plaintiff’s counsel may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in connection with this
21
22
action.
23
24 The parties further agree that the EAJA award is without prejudice to the right
25
of Plaintiff’s attorney to seek attorney fees pursuant to Social Security Act § 206(b),
26
27
28
1| 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to the offset provisions of the EAJA. See 28 U.S.C. §
2
2412(c)(1) (2006).
3
4
Dated: July 17, 2026 Respectfully Submitted,
5
6 Pierre Pierre Law, P.C.
7
8 *all signatories listed, and on whose
behalf the filing is submitted, concur in
9 the filing’s content and have authorized
10 this filing.
11
12 By: /s/ Nikhil Shreeham Agharkar
13 Attorney for Plaintiff
14
15
6 ERIC GRANT
United States Attorney
17
18 By: /s/Roseanne C. Gillette Lazzarotto*
19 Roseanne C. Gillette Lazzarotto
20 Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
21 Attorneys for Defendant
22
23 ORDER
27
Pursuant to the Stipulation, IT IS SOQ ORDERED.
28
Dated: September 3, 2026
CHI S00 KIM
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
7, prat.2635.25.stip.eaja
Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.