IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA
Richmond Division
JERRY STULL, )
Petitioner,
Civil Action No. 3:25-cv-707-HEH
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Respondent.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
(Dismissing 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Without Prejudice)
Petitioner, Jerry Stull, a federal inmate proceeding pro se, submitted a 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 petition (“§ 2241 Petition,” ECF No. 1) to the United States District Court for the
Eastern District of Pennsylvania (“Pennsylvania District Court”).! By Order entered on
September 2, 2025, the Pennsylvania District Court concluded the § 2241 Petition was in
fact and substance a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion and transferred the § 2241 Petition to this
Court. (ECF No. 3.) Stull, however, already has a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion pending in
his criminal case in the Newport News Division of this Court. (United States v. Stull,
4:23-cr-89-HEH-1 (E.D. Va.), ECF No. 41.)
The relevant statutes governing 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motions do not permit
individuals to litigate multiple 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motions simultaneously. Furthermore,
the Court is reluctant to convert his § 2241 Petition into a 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion. Cf
' Stull pled guilty in the United States District for the Eastern District of Virginia, Newport News
Division, without the benefit of plea agreement, to possession of firearm by a felon. United
States v. Stull, No. 24-4340, 2025 WL 2269774, at *1 (4th Cir. Aug. 8, 2025).
United States v. Blackstock, 513 F.3d 128, 132-33 (4th Cir. 2008) (explaining that the
district court must advise inmates of the consequences of filing a § 2255 motion before
converting a mislabeled post-conviction motion into a motion pursuant to § 2255).
Accordingly, the Court will dismiss the § 2241 Petition without prejudice to Stull’s filing
of a single, amended 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion raising all his claims that he wishes to
raise in his criminal case in the Newport News Division of this Court.
An appropriate Order will accompany this Memorandum Opinion.
VN
Date: Bet le 2626 Henry E. Hudson
Richmond, Virginia Senior United States District Judge
Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.