Najafi v. Bondi

Docket 5:25-cv-01110

Filed: 2025-09-02
Terminated: Not recorded
Case type: cv

Outcome

No sourced outcome is recorded. A termination date alone does not establish who prevailed.

Parties and representation

Party and firm records are not available for this case.

Panel

No sourced panel votes are recorded.

Opinions and documents

Opinion 2026-09-01 · Source
Opinion 2026-08-12 · Source

SAN ANTONIO DIVISION                               
HADI NAJAFI, A# 246-793-855,     §                                         
                            §                                         
     Petitioner,            §                                         
                            §                                         
V.                               §      CIVIL CASE NO. SA-25-CV-01110-FB   
                            §                                         
TODD BLANCHE, U.S. Attorney      §                                         
General, et al.,                 §                                         
                            §                                         
     Respondents.           §                                         
              ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND                              
   RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE                   
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge (ECF
No. 21) filed on August 12, 2026, concerning the Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
(“Petition”) (ECF No. 15) filed by Petitioner  Hadi Najafi (“Petitioner”).  To date, no objections to the
Report and Recommendation have been received.1                             
Because no party has objected to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, the Court
need not conduct a de novo review.  See 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) ("A judge of the court shall make a de
novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings and recommendations
to which objection is made.").  The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation and finds its
reasoning to be neither clearly erroneous nor contrary to law.  United States v. Wilson, 864 F.2d 1219,
1221 (5th Cir.), cert. denied, 492 U.S. 918 (1989).                        
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation of United States
Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 21) is ACCEPTED pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) such that the
Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (ECF No. 15) is GRANTED IN PART as follows:

 1  Any party who desires to object to a Magistrate's findings and recommendations must serve and file his, her or its written objections within
  1.     Respondents are DIRECTED to RELEASE Petitioner Hadi Najafi, A# 246-793-855, 
from custody, under  an order of supervision, to a public place no later than September 4, 2026. 
 2.     Respondents must NOTIFY Petitioner’s counsel of the exact location and exact time 
of release as soon as practicable and no less than two hours before release. 
 3.     Respondents shall FILE a status report no later than September 5, 2026, confirming that 
Petitioner has been released. 
 ITIS FINALLY ORDERED that motions pending with the Court, ifany, are Dismissed as Moot 
and this case is CLOSED. 
 It is so ORDERED. 
 SIGNED this Ist day of September, 2026. 
                                     “  jeer   C a 
                           FRED BIE 
                           UNITEDSTATES DISTRICTJUDGE

Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.