Opinions and documents
1 The Honorable Jamal N. Whitehead
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8 WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
AT SEATTLE
9
GIAUNIE HENDRIX, individually and on
10 behalf of all others similarly situated,
No. 2:25-cv-01663-JNW
11 Plaintiff,
STIPULATED MOTION AND
12 v. [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR
CONSOLIDATION AND FILING
13 LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC., OF CONSOLIDATED AMENDED
COMPLAINT
14 Defendant.
NOTE ON MOTION CALENDAR:
15 November 6, 2025
16
STEPHEN LISS and JOSHUA TAYLOR, on No. 3:25-cv-05840-JNW
17 their own behalf and on behalf of others similarly
situated, STIPULATED MOTION AND
18 [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR
Plaintiffs, CONSOLIDATION AND FILING
19 OF CONSOLIDATED AMENDED
v. COMPLAINT
20
LENOVO (UNITED STATES) INC., NOTE ON MOTION CALENDAR:
21 November 6, 2025
Defendant.
22
23
24
25
26
27
STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
1 STIPULATED MOTION
2 Pursuant to Local Civil Rules 7(d)(1), 10(g) and 42(b), and Federal Rules of Civil
3 Procedure 6 and 42, the Parties stipulate and agree as follows:
4 1. The above-captioned proposed class actions (“Hendrix” and “Liss/Taylor”) each
5 allege claims against Lenovo (United States) Inc. (“Lenovo”) based on Lenovo’s alleged
6 violations of the Commercial Electronic Mail Act and Consumer Protection Act. See Hendrix,
7 Dkt. 1-2 (“Hendrix Compl.”); Liss/Taylor, Dkt. 1-1 (“Liss/Taylor Compl.”).
8 2. Both cases are putative class actions with overlapping classes. Hendrix Compl.
9 ¶ 47 (defining putative class as “all Washington residents who received promotional emails from
10 Lenovo with subject lines advertising sales or discounts on Lenovo Products”); Liss/Taylor
11 Compl. ¶ 92 (defining putative class as “[a]ll Washington citizens holding an email address to
12 which Defendant sent or caused to be sent any email listed in Exhibit A during the Class
13 Period.”). Exhibit A to the Liss/Taylor Complaint lists alleged promotional emails from Lenovo
14 with subject lines purportedly advertising sales or discounts on Lenovo products. Liss/Taylor
15 Compl., Ex. A.
16 3. Recognizing the similarities between the cases, Lenovo filed notices of related
17 case in both Hendrix and Liss/Taylor pursuant to LCR 3(g). See Hendrix Dkt. 15; Liss/Taylor
18 Dkt. 14.
19 4. Counsel for Lenovo and counsel for the Plaintiffs in both Hendrix and Liss/Taylor
20 have conferred about consolidating the two actions. The Parties agree that consolidation of the
21 Hendrix and Liss/Taylor actions is appropriate because the actions involve materially similar
22 factual and legal allegations and consolidation will result in substantial efficiencies in managing
23 both cases. See In re Valve Antitrust Litig., 2024 WL 5009034, at *1 (W.D. Wash. Dec. 6, 2024)
24 (finding “that given the sole defendant and overlapping factual and legal issues, consolidation
25 will promote judicial economy, ensure consistent results, and streamline matters overall” and
26 consolidating cases); Doe v. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Ctr., 2024 WL 69881, at *1 (W.D. Wash.
27
STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
1 Jan. 5, 2024) (“Consolidation is appropriate [where] … the [two] actions present common
2 questions of law and fact and there are substantial efficiencies to be gained.”).
3 5. Because consolidation will require the filing of a consolidated amended
4 complaint, the Parties have discussed and agreed upon a schedule for filing the consolidated
5 amended complaint.
6 6. Based on the foregoing, the Parties stipulate and agree as follows, subject to the
7 Court’s approval:
8 • The Hendrix and Liss/Taylor actions shall be consolidated under the earlier-
9 filed Hendrix case number;
10 • Plaintiffs shall file a consolidated amended complaint within 30 days of the
11 Court’s order granting this stipulation to consolidate; and
12 • The parties request that the Court issue an Amended Initial Scheduling Order
13 following any order granting this stipulation to consolidate, to allow for the
14 filing of the consolidated amended complaint before the initial case deadlines.
15 7. The Parties have previously sought and obtained prior extensions of time in these
16 matters. The deadline for Lenovo to respond to the consolidated amended complaint and
17 associated briefing schedule for any responsive motion will be addressed by later stipulation of
18 the Parties.
19
20 IT IS SO STIPULATED.
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
1 DATED this 6th day of November, 2025.
2 DOVEL & LUNER, LLP DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
3
By: s/ Jonas B. Jacobson By s/ Lauren B. Rainwater*
4 Jonas B. Jacobson, WSBA #62890 Lauren B. Rainwater, WSBA #43625
Martin Brenner, pro hac vice Rachel Herd, WSBA #50339
5 201 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 600 Caleah N. Whitten, WSBA #60209
Santa Monica, CA 90401 Katie Chan, WSBA #56970
6 Tel.: 310-656-7066 920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
E-mail: jonas@dovel.com Seattle, WA 98104-1610
7
E-mail: martin@dovel.com Telephone: 206-622-3150
8 E-mail: laurenrainwater@dwt.com
BARG SINGER HOESLY PC E-mail: rachelherd@dwt.com
9 Cody Hoesly, WSBA #41190 E-mail: caleahwhitten@dwt.com
121 SW Morrison St., Suite 600 E-mail: katiechan@dwt.com
10 Portland, OR 97204
Tel.: 503-241-3311 Attorneys for Defendant
11
E-mail: choesly@bargsinger.com Lenovo (United States) Inc.
12
13 Attorneys for Plaintiff Giaunie Hendrix *I certify that this memorandum contains
495 words, in compliance with the Local
14 Civil Rules.
15
SMITH & DIETRICH LAW OFFICES PLLC
16
17 By: s/ Walter Smith
Walter Smith, WSBA #46695
18 1226 State Avenue, N.E., Suite 205
Olympia, WA 98506
19
Telephone: 360-915-6952
20 walter@smithdietrich.com
21 STRAUSS BORRELLI, LLP
Samuel J. Strauss, WSBA #46971
22
Raina C. Borrelli, pro hac vice forthcoming
23 980 N. Michigan Avenue, Suite 1610
Chicago, IL 60611
24 sam@straussborrelli.com
raina@straussborrelli.com
25
26
27
STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
COHENMALAD, LLP
1 Lynn A. Toops, pro hac vice
Natalie A. Lyons, pro hac vice
2
Ian R. Bensberg, pro hac vice forthcoming
3 One Indiana Square, Suite 1400
Indianapolis, IN 46204
4 ltoops@cohenmalad.com
nlyons@cohenmalad.com
5 ibensberg@cohenmalad.com
6
STRANCH, JENNINGS & GARVEY, PLLC
7 J. Gerard Stranch, IV, pro hac vice forthcoming
Michael C. Tackeff, pro hac vice
8 223 Rosa L. Parks Avenue, Suite 200
Nashville, TN 37203
9
gstranch@stranchlaw.com
10 mtackeff@stranchlaw.com
11 Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Stephen Liss and Joshua Taylor
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
[PROPOSED] ORDER
1
2 Pursuant to the Parties’ above stipulated motion, the Court Orders that:
3
• Hendrix v. Lenovo (United States) Inc., Case No. 2:25-cv-01663-JNW be
4
consolidated with Liss v. Lenovo (United States) Inc., Case No. 3:25-cv-05840-
5
JNW (the “Consolidated Action”);
6
7 • Plaintiffs in Hendrix and Liss/Taylor are granted 30 days from the date of entry of
8 this order to file a consolidated amended complaint; and
9
• The deadlines in the Initial Scheduling Orders, Hendrix Dkt. 18 and Liss Dkt. 19,
10
are hereby vacated. The Court will separately enter an Amended Initial
11
Scheduling Order.
12
13 IT IS SO ORDERED this 25th day of November 2025.
14
A
15
16 Jamal N. Whitehead
United States District Judge
17
18
19 Presented by:
20
DAVIS WRIGHT TREMAINE LLP
21 Lauren B. Rainwater, WSBA #43625
Rachel Herd, WSBA #50339
22 Caleah N. Whitten, WSBA #60209
Katie Chan, WSBA #56970
23
920 Fifth Avenue, Suite 3300
24 Seattle, WA 98104-1610
Telephone: 206-622-3150
25 E-mail: laurenrainwater@dwt.com
E-mail: rachelherd@dwt.com
26 E-mail: caleahwhitten@dwt.com
E-mail: katiechan@dwt.com
27
STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
1 Attorneys for Defendant
Lenovo (United States) Inc.
2
3
BARG SINGER HOESLY PC
4 Cody Hoesly, WSBA #41190
121 SW Morrison St., Suite 600
5 Portland, OR 97204
Tel.: 503-241-3311
6
E-mail: choesly@bargsinger.com
7
DOVEL & LUNER, LLP
8 Jonas B. Jacobson, WSBA #62890
Martin Brenner, pro hac vice
9
201 Santa Monica Blvd., Suite 600
10 Santa Monica, CA 90401
Tel.: 310-656-7066
11 E-mail: jonas@dovel.com
E-maill: martin@dovel.com
12
Attorneys for Plaintiff Giaunie Hendrix
13
14
15 SMITH & DIETRICH LAW OFFICES PLLC
Walter Smith, WSBA #46695
16 1226 State Avenue, N.E., Suite 205
Olympia, WA98506
17
Telephone: 360-915-6952
18 walter@smithdietrich.com
19 STRAUSS BORRELLI, LLP
Samuel J. Strauss, WSBA #46971
20 Raina C. Borrelli, pro hac vice forthcoming
980 N. Michigan Avenue, Suite 1610
21
Chicago, IL 60611
22 sam@straussborrelli.com
raina@straussborrelli.com
23
COHENMALAD, LLP
24 Lynn A. Toops, pro hac vice
Natalie A. Lyons, pro hac vice
25
Ian R. Bensberg, pro hac vice forthcoming
26 One Indiana Square, Suite 1400
Indianapolis, IN 46204
27
STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
ltoops@cohenmalad.com
1 nlyons@cohenmalad.com
ibensberg@cohenmalad.com
2
3 STRANCH, JENNINGS & GARVEY, PLLC
J. Gerard Stranch, IV, pro hac vice forthcoming
4 Michael C. Tackeff, pro hac vice
223 Rosa L. Parks Avenue, Suite 200
5 Nashville, TN 37203
gstranch@stranchlaw.com
6
mtackeff@stranchlaw.com
7
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
8 Stephen Liss and Joshua Taylor
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
STIPULATED MOTION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.