Lawrence v. Experian Information Soluitions, Inc.

Docket 1:25-cv-04500

Filed
2025-08-12
Terminated
Not recorded
Case type
cv

Outcome

other judgment · defendant

FJC civil IDB DISTRICT=07 OFFICE=1 DOCKET=2504500 FILEDATE=08/12/2025 DISP=17, PROCPROG=2, JUDGMENT=2; codebook: https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default/files/idb/codebooks/Civil%20Codebook%201988%20Forward%2010252023.pdf

Outcome source

Parties and representation

      Party and firm records are not available for this case.

      Panel

        No sourced panel votes are recorded.

        Opinions and documents

        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------X GLEN LEE ANDREW LAWRENCE, Plaintiff, ORD ER A D O PTING REPORT & RECOMMENDATION -against- 25-CV-04500 (RER) (LKE) EXPERIAN INFORMATION SOLUTIONS, INC; EQUIFAX INFORMATION SERVICES LLC; TRANS UNION LLC. Defendants. ---------------------------------------------------------------X RAMÓN E. REYES, JR., District Judge: In a report and recommendation dated January 6, 2026 (Order dated 1/06/2026 (the “R&R”)), Magistrate Judge Lara K. Eshkenazi recommended that the Court dismiss Plaintiff’s claims for failure to prosecute. (Id.) Judge Eshkenazi advised the parties that they had fourteen days from the date that the R&R was received to file objections. (Id.) To date, neither party has filed an objection to the R&R, and the time to do so has passed. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(2). Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, the Court has reviewed the R&R for clear error and, finding none, adopts the R&R in its entirety. See Covey v. Simonton, 481 F. Supp. 2d 224, 226 (E.D.N.Y. 2007). Therefore, it is ordered that the R&R is adopted in its entirety, and this action is dismissed with prejudice. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of defendants and to close this case. SO ORDERED. /s/ Ramón E. Reyes, Jr. RAMÓN E. REYES, JR. United States District Judge Dated: January 22, 2026 Brooklyn, New York

        Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.