Grace v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Docket 3:25-cv-01344

Filed
2025-07-31
Terminated
Not recorded
Case type
cv

Outcome

remanded to U.S. agency

FJC civil IDB DISTRICT=79 OFFICE=3 DOCKET=2501344 FILEDATE=07/31/2025 DISP=11, PROCPROG=10, JUDGMENT=0; codebook: https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default/files/idb/codebooks/Civil%20Codebook%201988%20Forward%2010252023.pdf

Outcome source

Parties and representation

      Party and firm records are not available for this case.

      Panel

        No sourced panel votes are recorded.

        Opinions and documents

        IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON LEAH M. GRACE, Case No. 3:25-cv-01344-AR Plaintiff, Vv. ORDER FOR FEES UNDER THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT, 28 COMMISSIONER, SOCIAL SECURITY | U-S-C. § 2412(d) ADMINISTRATION, Defendant. It is hereby ORDERED that fees in the amount of $7,168.04 shall be awarded to Plaintiff pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d). Attorney and paralegal fees in the amount of $7,168.04 will be paid to Plaintiff's attorney, subject to verification that Plaintiff does not have a debt which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees, pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). If Plaintiff has no such debt, then the check shall be made out to Plaintiffs attorney, H. Peter Evans. If Plaintiff has a debt, then the check for any remaining funds after offset of the debt shall be made out to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff's attorney’s office. IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED this 7th day of July 2026. J 4 a United States Magistrate Judge ORDER FOR EAJA FEES - 1 [3:25-cv-01344-AR] Proposed Order submitted on July 6, 2026. /s/ H. Peter Evans H. Peter Evans, OSB 012532 Attorney for Plaintiff

        Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.