Sellars v. Bulldog Marine & Construction, Inc.

Docket 6:25-cv-00197

Filed
2025-05-28
Terminated
Not recorded
Case type
cv

Outcome

default judgment · plaintiff

FJC civil IDB DISTRICT=40 OFFICE=6 DOCKET=2500197 FILEDATE=05/28/2025 DISP=4, PROCPROG=12, JUDGMENT=1; codebook: https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default/files/idb/codebooks/Civil%20Codebook%201988%20Forward%2010252023.pdf

Outcome source

Parties and representation

      Party and firm records are not available for this case.

      Panel

        No sourced panel votes are recorded.

        Opinions and documents

        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS No. 6:25-cv-00197 Zachary Sellars, Plaintiff, V. Bulldog Marine & Construction, Inc., et al., Defendants. ORDER Plaintiff filed this action under the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), seeking backpay alleged to have been improperly with- held. Doc. 1. The case was referred to a magistrate judge. Doc. 5. Despite being served with process, defendant did not file an an- swer or otherwise respond to the complaint. As a result, the clerk entered default at plaintiff’s request. Doc. 8. Plaintiff then moved for default judgment and requested a hearing on damages. Doc. 10. The magistrate judge issued a report recommending that plaintiff’s motion be denied. Doc. 11 at 5. The report detailed at length why plaintiff’s complaint was factually insufficient to sup- port default judgment and suggested that plaintiff file an amended complaint to address those deficiencies. /d. at 3-5. Plaintiff did not file objections to the report but did file an amended complaint. Doc. 12. When there have been no timely objections to a report, or the objections are improper, “the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b), advisory committee’s notes to 1983 amendment. Having re- viewed the record and being satisfied that there is no clear error, the court accepts the report’s findings and recommendations. The court also notes that plaintiff’s amended complaint (Doc. 12) utterly fails to address the pleading deficiencies that the mag- istrate judge identified in the report. Default judgment is im- proper if not “supported by well-pleaded allegations.” Nishimatsu -l- Constr. Co. v. Hou. Nat’l Bank, 515 F.2d 1200, 1206 (5th Cir. 1975). To avoid dismissal at a later stage, plaintiff must plead more than a threadbare recital of the elements of his FLSA claim. Plaintiff may request leave under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 15 to amend his complaint to address the deficiencies outlined by the magistrate judge. Plaintiff’s motion for default judgement (Doc. 10) is denied without prejudice. So ordered by the court on September 30, 2025. faacbok BARKER United States District Judge -2-

        Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.