Sanders v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Docket 5:25-cv-00505

Filed
2025-05-08
Terminated
Not recorded
Case type
cv

Outcome

remanded to U.S. agency

FJC civil IDB DISTRICT=87 OFFICE=5 DOCKET=2500505 FILEDATE=05/08/2025 DISP=11, PROCPROG=4, JUDGMENT=0; codebook: https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default/files/idb/codebooks/Civil%20Codebook%201988%20Forward%2010252023.pdf

Outcome source

Parties and representation

      Party and firm records are not available for this case.

      Panel

        No sourced panel votes are recorded.

        Opinions and documents

        IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA SARAH MAE SANDERS, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-25-505-PRW ) FRANK BISIGNANO, Commissioner ) of the Social Security Administration, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER On October 21, 2025, United States Magistrate Judge Amanda Maxfield issued a Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 21) in this action, in which she recommends that the Court grant the Stipulations Awarding EAJA Fees (Dkt. 17). Judge Maxfield advised the parties of their right to object to the Report and Recommendation by November 4, 2025, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636 and Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72, and that failure to make a timely objection would waive any right to appellate review of the factual and legal issues addressed in the Report and Recommendation. To date, neither party has filed any objections. They have therefore waived their right to appellate review of the factual and legal issues addressed in the Report and Recommendation.1 Upon review, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation (Dkt. 21) in full and GRANTS the Stipulations Awarding EAJA Fees (Dkt. 17), granting an award of fees 1 United States v. One Parcel of Real Prop., 73 F.3d 1057, 1059–60 (10th Cir. 1996). payable in the name of Plaintiff in the amount of $5,761.80. The Court further GRANTS Plaintiff's Supplementation to Stipulations Awarding EAJA Fees (Dkt. 20). IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of December 2025. PATRICK R. WYRICK UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

        Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.