Power v. Social Security Administration

Docket 6:25-cv-00117

Filed
2025-04-16
Terminated
Not recorded
Case type
cv

Outcome

magistrate appeal denied

FJC civil IDB DISTRICT=86 OFFICE=6 DOCKET=2500117 FILEDATE=04/16/2025 DISP=20, PROCPROG=4, JUDGMENT=0; codebook: https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default/files/idb/codebooks/Civil%20Codebook%201988%20Forward%2010252023.pdf

Outcome source

Parties and representation

      Party and firm records are not available for this case.

      Panel

        No sourced panel votes are recorded.

        Opinions and documents

        IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA KEVIN LAROY POWER, ) ) Plaintiff, ) v. ) Case No. CIV-25-117-GLJ ) FRANK J. BISIGNANO,1 ) Commissioner of the Social ) Security Administration, ) ) Defendant. ) CORRECTED OPINION AND ORDER The Court, having considered Defendant’s Unopposed Motion for Remand Pursuant to Sentence Six of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) [Docket No. 14], hereby grants Defendant’s Motion and REMANDS the case to Defendant for further proceedings pursuant to the sixth sentence of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 297 n.2 (1993). Upon remand by the Court, the Appeals Council shall issue an amended decision addressing the issues raised in the representative’s January 7, 2025, letter objecting to the partially favorable decision. In issuing its amended decision, the Appeals Council will not disturb the favorable portion of the decision. The Court will retain jurisdiction over the case until after the conclusion of the remand proceedings. Final judgment shall not enter until such time as the remand proceedings are completed and the matter returns to this Court. 1 On May 6, 2025, Frank J. Bisignano became the Commissioner of Social Security. In IT IS SO ORDERED this 22nd day of October 2025. GERALD L. JACKSON UNITED STATED MAGISTRATE JUDGE

        Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.