Al DABRBRISONBURG, VA
FILED
May 06, 2025
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT LAURA A. AUSTIN, CLER’
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA ny: s/J.Vasquez
ROANOKE DIVISION DEPUTY CLERK
CHRISTOPHER D. LUMPKIN, )
Petitioner, ) Civil Action No. 7:25-cv-00147
)
Vv. )
) By: Elizabeth K. Dillon
COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA, ) Chief United States District Judge
Respondent. )
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
The petitioner, Christopher D. Lumpkin, filed this 28 U.S.C. § 2254 action on January
21, 2025. The action was filed in the Eastern District of Virginia and then transferred to this
district on March 4. (Dkt. No. 4.)
Lumpkin’s petition challenges his convictions and four life sentences in the Circuit Court
for the City of Danville for forcible sodomy of a child under the age of thirteen, object sexual
penetration of a child under the age of thirteen, and aggravated sexual battery of a child under the
age of thirteen. Case Nos. CR20000741, 743, 745, 746, 747, 748 (Danville Cir. Ct.). Lumpkin
previously filed a separate § 2254 petition challenging the same convictions that are currently
pending in this court. Case No. 7:24-cv-00860 (W.D. Va.) Accordingly, the instant action will
be dismissed without prejudice as a duplicative action. See, e.g., Dickerson v. Warden, Broad
River Corr. Inst., Case No. 2:20-cv-03177-JMC-MGB, 2020 WL 9596012, at *1 (D.S.C. Dec. 4,
2020) (recommending summary dismissal of a § 2254 petition because it was “duplicative of a
habeas petition already pending before this court” and that the court give “appropriate
consideration” to petitioner’s claims in the separate action).
Accordingly, it is HEREBY ORDERED that petitioner is GRANTED leave to proceed in
forma pauperis. tis FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice.
Finding that petitioner has not made a substantial showing of the deprivation of a constitutional
right, 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2), the court DECLINES to issue a certificate of appealability. The
Clerk is directed to STRIKE this matter from the active docket of the court and to transmit a
copy of this memorandum opinion and order to petitioner.
Entered: May 6, 2025.
/s/ Elizabeth K. Dillon
Elizabeth K. Dillon
Chief United States District Judge
Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.