UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
LUIS CHUQUI,
Plaintiff,
-v-
CIVIL ACTION NO. 25 Civ. 1324 (SLC)
EMPIRE WINGS EXPRESS INC., et al.,
ORDER
Defendants.
SARAH L. CAVE, United States Magistrate Judge.
The parties in this wage-and-hour case under the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) have
consented to my jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 73 for purposes of
reviewing their proposed settlement. (ECF No. 24). Plaintiff has submitted a Letter-Motion in
support of settlement (ECF No. 22), proposed settlement agreement (ECF No. 22-1 (the
“Agreement”)), damages chart (ECF No. 22-2), Plaintiff’s time records (ECF No. 22-3), and
Plaintiff’s invoices (ECF No. 22-4) for approval under Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc.,
796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015).
It appears from Plaintiff’s Letter-Motion in support of settlement (ECF No. 22 at 5) and
Plaintiff’s time records (ECF No. 22-3) that Spanish is his primary language. The copy of the
Agreement, however, is in English and does not include any representation that it was translated
for Plaintiff into Spanish, his primary language. See Rosario v. MCS Properties LLC,
No. 17 Civ. 5573 (RA), 2018 WL 6538183, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 20, 2018) (finding fair and
reasonable FLSA settlement agreement that had been translated into plaintiff’s primary
language). Plaintiff also has not provided the Court with copies of his retainer agreement or
engagement letter with his counsel.
Accordingly, by Friday, July 25, 2025, Plaintiff’s counsel shall provide (i) confirmation that
the Agreement was translated into Spanish for Plaintiff's benefit before execution, and (ii) copies
of Plaintiff's retainer agreement or engagement letter with his counsel.
Dated: New York, New York
July 21, 2025
SO ORDERED
Andes LCA
United States Magistrate Judge
Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.