IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO
MICHAEL MCKINNEY,
Plaintiff,
v. No. 25-cv-39 JMC/LF
CURRY COUNTY 9TH DISTRICT
ATTORNEY’S OFFICE, et al.,
Defendants.
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
This matter is before the Court following Plaintiff Michael McKinney’s failure to prosecute
his pro se Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint (Doc. 1) (Complaint). Plaintiff is proceeding pro se
and was incarcerated when he initiated this case. On January 13, 2025, he filed an Application to
Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Doc. 2), but he did not submit a six-
month inmate account statement. The inmate account statement is required by statute in all cases
where, as here, an inmate files a complaint without prepaying the filing fee. See 28 U.S.C. §
1915(a)(2). By an Order to Cure Deficiencies entered July 21, 2025, the Court directed Plaintiff
to file the statement within thirty days. See (Doc. 3). The Order warns that the failure to timely
comply will result in dismissal of this case without further notice.
The deadline to submit an account statement was August 20, 2025. Plaintiff did not
comply, show cause for such failure, or otherwise respond to the Order, which was returned as
undeliverable. See (Doc. 4). Plaintiff has also not provided an updated address as required by
D.N.M. Local Civil Rule 83.6. For these reasons, the Court will dismiss the Complaint without
prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b) for “failure to prosecute or comply with the rules of
civil procedure or court’s orders.” Olsen v. Mapes, 333 F.3d 1199, 1204 n. 3 (10th Cir. 2003);
see also Salazar v. Arapahoe Cty. Det. Facility, 787 Fed. App’x 542, 543 (10th Cir. 2019)
(affirming dismissal order where plaintiff failed to “address[] the inmate account statement or
explain[] his failure to comply with the ordered deadline”). The Court will also deny Plaintiff's
pending Application to Proceed in District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Doc. 2), which
is now moot.
IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that Plaintiff Michael McKinney’s Prisoner Civil
Rights Complaint (Doc. 1) is DISMISSED without prejudice; his Application to Proceed in
District Court Without Prepaying Fees or Costs (Doc. 2) is DENIED as moot; and the Court will
enter a separate judgment closing this civil case.
Gil Mh. Le
JOELM.CARSONIT
UNITED STATES CIRCUIT JUDGE
Sitting by Designation
Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.