Opinions and documents
1 District Judge Ricardo S. Martinez
2
3
4
5
6
7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON
8 AT SEATTLE
9
HASSAN ELAKIL, et al., Case No. 2:24-cv-02104-RSM
10
Plaintiffs, STIPULATED MOTION TO HOLD
11 v. CASE IN ABEYANCE AND ORDER
12 ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, et al., Noted for Consideration:
January 17, 2025
13 Defendants.
14
15 Plaintiffs and Defendants, by and through their counsel of record, pursuant to Federal
16 Rule of Civil Procedure 6 and Local Rules 7(d)(1), 10(g) and 16, hereby jointly stipulate and
17 move to stay these proceedings until May 23, 2025. Plaintiffs brought this litigation pursuant to
18 the Administrative Procedure Act seeking, inter alia, to compel U.S. Citizenship and
19 Immigration Services (“USCIS”) to adjudicate Plaintiff Elakil’s Form I-130, Petition for Alien
20 Relative. Defendants’ response to the Complaint is currently due on February 28, 2025. The
21 parties are currently working towards a resolution to this litigation. For good cause, the parties
22 request that the Court hold the case in abeyance until May 23, 2025.
23 Courts have “broad discretion” to stay proceedings. Clinton v. Jones, 520 U.S. 681, 706
24 (1997). “[T]he power to stay proceedings is incidental to the power inherent in every court to
1 control the disposition of the causes on its docket with economy of time and effort for itself, for
2 counsel, and for litigants.” Landis v. N. Am. Co., 299 U.S. 248, 254 (1936); see also Fed. R. Civ.
3 P. 1.
4 With additional time, this case may be resolved without the need of further judicial
5 intervention. USCIS recently issued a Notice of Intent to Deny (“NOID”) the Form I-130.
6 Plaintiff has until April 19, 2025, to submit a response to the NOID. Once Plaintiff has
7 submitted the response, USCIS will need time to review it and continue with processing of the
8 Form I-130. Because further litigation may not be necessary after the review is completed, the
9 parties agree that holding this case in abeyance through May 23, 2025, is appropriate. Therefore,
10 the parties believe good cause exists for a stay in these proceedings to save the parties and this
11 Court from spending unnecessary time and judicial resources on this matter.
12 Accordingly, the parties request that the Court hold the case in abeyance until May 23,
13 2025. The parties will submit a joint status report on or before May 23, 2025.
14 //
15
16 //
17
18 //
19
20 //
21
22 //
23
24 //
1 DATED this 17th day of January, 2025.
2 Respectfully submitted,
3 TESSA M. GORMAN JEELANI LAW FIRM, PLC
United States Attorney
4
s/ Michelle R. Lambert s/ Sadaf F. Ahmed
5 MICHELLE R. LAMBERT, NYS #4666657 SADAF F. AHMED, PHV
Assistant United States Attorney Jeelani Law Firm, PLC
6 United States Attorney’s Office 3701 W. Algonquin Road, Suite 630
Western District of Washington Rolling Meadows, Illinois 60008
7 1201 Pacific Avenue, Suite 700 Phone: 312-767-9030
Tacoma, Washington 98402 Email: sadaf@jeelani-law.com
8 Phone: (253) 428-3824
Fax: (253) 428-3826 GIBBS HOUSTON PAUW
9 Email: michelle.lambert@usdoj.gov
s/ Adam Boyd
10 Attorneys for Defendants ADAM BOYD WSBA# 49849
Gibbs Houston Pauw
11 I certify that this memorandum contains 328 1000 Second Avenue, Suite 1600
words, in compliance with the Local Civil Rules. Seattle, Washington 98104-1003
12 Phone: 206-682-1080
Email: adam.boyd@ghp-law.net
13
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
1 ORDER
2 The case is held in abeyance until May 23, 2025. The parties shall submit a status update
3 on or before May 23, 2025. It is so ORDERED.
4
5 DATED this 21st day of January, 2025.
6
A
7
RICARDO S. MARTINEZ
8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.