UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
TAMPA DIVISION
STEPHANIE CHAPPELLE,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No. 5:24-cv-00680-AEP
LELAND DUDEK,
Commissioner of Social Security,
Defendant.
/
ORDER
This cause comes before the Court on Plaintiff’s Unopposed Motion for
Attorney’s Fees. (Doc. 16). By the Motion, Plaintiff seeks attorney’s fees in the
amount of $1,054.13 pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28
U.S.C. § 2412(d). On February 3, 2025, this Court entered an Order reversing and
remanding the case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings.
(Doc. 13). Thereafter, the Clerk entered judgment in favor of Plaintiff. (Doc. 14).
As the prevailing party, Plaintiff now requests an award of attorney’s fees.
See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A); cf. Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 300–02 (1993)
(concluding that a party who wins a sentence-four remand order under 42 U.S.C. §
405(g) is a prevailing party), superseded by rule on other grounds, Fed. R. Civ. P.
58(c)(2)(B). After issuance of an order awarding EAJA fees, the United States
Department of the Treasury will determine whether Plaintiff owes a debt to the
government. If Plaintiff has no discernable federal debt, the government will accept
Plaintiff's assignment of EAJA fees and pay the fees directly to Plaintiff's counsel.
The Commissioner does not oppose the requested relief. (Doc. 16, at 4).
Additionally, Plaintiff's attorney filed a declaration in support of the motion. (Doc.
16, at 2-5). Therefore, for the reasons set out in Plaintiff's motion and supported by
the affidavits, it is hereby
ORDERED:
1. Plaintiffs Unopposed Motion for Attorney’s Fees (Doc. 16) is
GRANTED.
2. Plaintiff is awarded fees in the amount of $1,054.13. Unless the
Department of Treasury determines that Plaintiff owes a federal debt, the
government must pay the fees and costs to Plaintiff's counsel in accordance with
Plaintiff's assignment. (Docs. 16, at 4).
DONE AND ORDERED in Tampa, Florida, on this 25th day of February
2025.
7 oes oe
Let,
p/"} V)}
ANTHONY E. PORCELLI
United Sfates Magistrate Judge
cc: Counsel of Record
Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.