Gonzalez v. J&G Italian Restaurant Corp.

Docket 1:24-cv-09405

Filed
2024-12-10
Terminated
2025-06-09
Case type
cv

Outcome

settled

FJC civil IDB DISTRICT=08 OFFICE=1 DOCKET=2409405 FILEDATE=12/10/2024 DISP=13, PROCPROG=10, JUDGMENT=0; codebook: https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default/files/idb/codebooks/Civil%20Codebook%201988%20Forward%2010252023.pdf

Outcome source

Parties and representation

      Party and firm records are not available for this case.

      Panel

        No sourced panel votes are recorded.

        Opinions and documents

        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK ---------------------------------------------------------------X EDUARDO GONZALEZ, : : : 24-CV-9405 (RWL) Plaintiff, : : ORDER - against - : APPROVING SETTLEMENT : AND DISMISSING CASE J&G ITALIAN RESTAURANT CORP. et al.,, : : : Defendants. : ---------------------------------------------------------------X ROBERT W. LEHRBURGER, United States Magistrate Judge. This case is an action for damages under the Fair Labor Standards Act, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq. (“FLSA”) and the New York Labor Law. Before the Court is the parties’ joint letter request that the Court approve their settlement agreement, a fully executed copy of which was submitted on June 9, 2025. A federal court is obligated to determine whether settlement of an FLSA case under the court’s consideration is fair and reasonable and the subject of an arm’s length negotiation, not an employer’s overreaching. See Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, 796 F.3d 199 (2d Cir. 2015). The Court has carefully reviewed the Settlement Agreement, following revision at the request of the Court, as well as the parties’ letter. The Court has taken into account, without limitation, prior proceedings in this action; the attendant risks, burdens, and costs associated with continuing the action; the range of possible recovery; whether the Settlement Agreement is the product of arm’s length bargaining between experienced counsel or parties; the amount of attorney’s fees; and the possibility of fraud or collusion. Among other attributes of the Settlement Agreement, there are no confidentiality restrictions; the release is narrowly tailored to wage and hour claims (a result of the Court’s requested revision); and the attorneys’ fees are within a fair, reasonable, and acceptable range. The Settlement Agreement does include a non-disparagement provision, but it is mutual and does not prohibit truthful statements about the case or underlying facts. Considering all the circumstances, the Court finds that the Settlement Agreement is fair and reasonable and hereby approved. This case, having resolved by settlement, is hereby dismissed and discontinued in its entirety, with prejudice, without costs or fees to any party, except as provided for in the parties’ settlement agreement. The Clerk of Court is respectfully requested to terminate all motions and deadlines, and close this case. SO ORDERED. ROBERT W.LEHRBURGERit*™” UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE Dated: June 9, 2025 New York, New York Copies transmitted to all counsel of record.

        Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.