Coss v. Social Security Administration

Docket 1:24-cv-01063

Filed
2024-10-21
Terminated
Not recorded
Case type
cv

Outcome

magistrate appeal affirmed

FJC civil IDB DISTRICT=84 OFFICE=1 DOCKET=2401063 FILEDATE=10/21/2024 DISP=19, PROCPROG=4, JUDGMENT=0; codebook: https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default/files/idb/codebooks/Civil%20Codebook%201988%20Forward%2010252023.pdf

Outcome source

Parties and representation

      Party and firm records are not available for this case.

      Panel

        No sourced panel votes are recorded.

        Opinions and documents

        IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO ALBERTO COSS, Plaintiff, Case No. 1:24-cv-1063-JMC-LF v. MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. ORDER OF REFERENCE RELATING TO SOCIAL SECURITY APPEALS In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §§ 636(b)(1)(B), (b)(3), and Virginia Beach Federal Savings and Loan Association v. Wood, 901 F.2d 849 (10th Cir. 1990), the Court refers this case to Magistrate Judge Laura Fashing to conduct hearings, if warranted, including evidentiary hearings, and to perform any legal analysis required to recommend to the Court an ultimate disposition of the case. The Magistrate Judge will submit an analysis, including findings of fact, if necessary, and recommended disposition, to the District Judge assigned to the case, with copies provided to the parties. The Court will give the parties the opportunity to object to the proposed findings, analysis, and disposition as described in 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Parties must file objections within fourteen (14) days after being served with a copy of the proposed disposition. IT IS SO ORDERED. Entered for the Court this the 6th day of December, 2024 /s/ Joel M. Carson III______ Joel M. Carson III United States Circuit Judge Sitting by Designation

        Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.