Bustos v. Warden

Docket 2:23-cv-00488

Filed
2023-10-03
Terminated
2024-03-27
Case type
cv

Outcome

other judgment

FJC civil IDB DISTRICT=22 OFFICE=2 DOCKET=2300488 FILEDATE=10/03/2023 DISP=17, PROCPROG=2, JUDGMENT=4; codebook: https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default/files/idb/codebooks/Civil%20Codebook%201988%20Forward%2010252023.pdf

Outcome source

Parties and representation

      Party and firm records are not available for this case.

      Panel

        No sourced panel votes are recorded.

        Opinions and documents

        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Norfolk Division JAIR ALEJANDR BUSTOS, #49028-048 Petitioner, v. ACTION NO. 2:23cv488 JUSTIN ANDREWS, Warden, Respondent. FINAL ORDER Petitioner Jair Alejandr Bustos (“Bustos”), a federal inmate housed in the Federal Correctional Institution Low in Petersburg, Virginia, filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241 on October 3, 2023. ECF No. 1. Bustos asserts that the Bureau of Prisons (“BOP”) failed to properly apply credits that he has earned under the First Step Act towards his early release. Id. at 2. This matter was referred to the United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and (C) and Local Civil Rule 72 of the Rules of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia for report and recommendation. The report and recommendation, filed February 21, 2024, recommends that Bustos’ petition be dismissed with prejudice. ECF No. 8. Each party was advised of the right to file written objections to the findings and recommendations made by the Magistrate Judge. Id. No objections have been filed. The Court, having reviewed the record, does hereby adopt and approve the findings and recommendations set forth in the report and recommendation. The Court, therefore, ORDERS that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 1, is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Bustos has failed to demonstrate a “substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right,” and, therefore, the Court declines to issue any certificate of appealability pursuant to Rule 22(b) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 335- 36 (2003). Bustos is ADVISED that because a certificate of appealability is denied by this Court, he may seek a certificate from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. Fed. R. App. P. 22(b); Rules Gov. § 2254 Cases in U.S. Dist. Cts. 11(a). If Bustos intends to seek a certificate of appealability from the Fourth Circuit, he must do so within thirty (30) days from the date of this final order. Bustos may seek such a certificate by filing a written notice of appeal with the Clerk of the United States District Court, United States Courthouse, 600 Granby Street, Norfolk, Virginia 23510. The Clerk shall mail a copy of this final order to Bustos and counsel of record for respondent. Is} ohA Elizabeth W. Hanes United States District Judge Elizabeth W. Hanes United States District Judge Norfolk, Virginia March 27, 2024

        Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.