Opinions and documents
1 Francesco Benavides, CSBN 258924
Law Offices of Francesco Benavides
2 1990 N. California Blvd. Suite 20
Walnut Creek, CA 94596
3
Tel: (925) 222-7071
4 Fax: (925) 522-5306
Email: francesco@benavidesdisabilitylaw.com
5
6 Attorney for Plaintiff
SHELBY MARIE GERST
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SACRAMENTO DIVISION
11
12 SHELBY MARIE GERST, Case No. 2:24-cv-00216-CSK
13
Plaintiff, STIPULATION FOR THE AWARD
14 AND PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES
15 v. AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO THE
EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT;
16 MARTIN J. O’MALLEY, ORDER
17 Commissioner of Social Security,
18 Defendant.
19 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their
20
undersigned counsel, subject to the approval of the Court, that Plaintiff be
21
awarded attorney fees and expenses in the amount of $1,540.94, under the
22
Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA), 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), and $405.00 in costs
23
under 28 U.S.C. § 1920. This amount represents compensation for all legal
24
services rendered on behalf of Plaintiff by counsel in connection with this civil
25
action, in accordance with 28 U.S.C. §§ 2412(d), 1920.
26
After the Court issues an order for EAJA fees to Plaintiff, the government
27
will consider the matter of Plaintiff’s assignment of EAJA fees to counsel.
1 Pursuant to Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586, 598, 130 S.Ct. 2521, 177 L.Ed.2d
2 91 (2010), the ability to honor the assignment will depend on whether the fees
3 are subject to any offset allowed under the United States Department of the
4 Treasury’s Offset Program. After the order for EAJA fees is entered, the
5
government will determine whether they are subject to any offset.
6
Fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff, but if the Department of the
7
Treasury determines that Plaintiff does not owe a federal debt, then the
8
government shall cause the payment of fees, expenses and costs to be made
9
directly to Plaintiff’s counsel, Francesco Benavides, pursuant to the
10
assignment executed by Plaintiff.
11
This stipulation constitutes a compromise settlement of Plaintiff’s
12
request for EAJA attorney fees and does not constitute an admission of
13
liability on the part of Defendant under the EAJA or otherwise. Payment of the
14
agreed amount shall constitute a complete release from, and bar to, any and
15
all claims that Plaintiff and/or Francesco Benavides, including the Law Offices
16
of Francesco Benavides, may have relating to EAJA attorney fees in
17
connection with this action.
18
This award is without prejudice to the rights of Francesco Benavides to
19
seek Social Security Act attorney fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b), subject to
20
the savings clause provisions of the EAJA.
21
22
Respectfully submitted,
23
24
Dated: March 29, 2024 Law Offices of Francesco Benavides
25
By: /s/ Francesco Benavides
26
FRANCESCO P. BENAVIDES
27 Attorney for Plaintiff
4 || Dated: March 29, 2024 PHILLIP A. TALBERT
United States Attorney
2 MATHEW W. PILE
3 Associate General Counsel
Social Security Administration
4
5 By: Christopher Vieira*
CHRISTOPHER VIEIRA
6 Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
7 Attorneys for Defendant
(“Permission to use electronic signature
8 obtained via email on March 29, 2024).
9
10
14 ORDER
12 Based upon the parties’ Stipulation for the Award and Payment of Equal
13 Access to Justice Act Fees and Expenses, IT IS ORDERED that fees and
14
45, || expenses in the amount of $1,540.94 as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and
16 || $405.00 in costs under 28 U.S.C. § 1920, be awarded subject to the terms of
the Stipulation.
18
19
20 || Dated: April 9, 2024
-_ Cc .
22 CHI SOO KIM
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
23
24
3.gers.216
25
26
27
28
-3-
Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.