Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. v. accesaudi.com

Docket 1:23-cv-00849

Filed
2023-06-29
Terminated
2023-12-14
Case type
cv

Outcome

judgment on motion before trial · plaintiff

FJC civil IDB DISTRICT=22 OFFICE=1 DOCKET=2300849 FILEDATE=06/29/2023 DISP=6, PROCPROG=2, JUDGMENT=1; codebook: https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default/files/idb/codebooks/Civil%20Codebook%201988%20Forward%2010252023.pdf

Outcome source

Parties and representation

      Party and firm records are not available for this case.

      Panel

        No sourced panel votes are recorded.

        Opinions and documents

        IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA Alexandria Division VOLKSWAGEN GROUP OF ) AMERICA, INC., ) Plaintiff, ) Case No. 1:23-ev-849 ) ACCESAUDL.COM, ef al., ) Defendants. ) ORDER On November 29, 2023, United States Magistrate Judge William E. Fitzpatrick entered a Report and Recommendation in this case, recommending that default judgment be entered in favor of Plaintiff Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., and against Defendant domain names <ac- cesaudi.com>, <acessaudi.com>, and <knowmyvw.com> on Plaintiff's Complaint. Upon consideration of the record and Judge Fitzpatrick’s Report, to which no objections have been filed, and having found no clear error,! the Court ADOPTS, as its own, the report and recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge. (Dkt. 38).” Accordingly, It is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff's motion for default judgment (Dkt. 32) is GRANTED. 1 In the absence of any objections to a magistrate judge’s report, a court “need not conduct a de novo review, but instead must ‘only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation.” Diamond v. Colonial Life & Acc. Ins. Co., 416 F.3d 310, 315 (4th Cir. 2005). 2 The Magistrate Judge correctly explained that the Anti-Cybersquatting Consumer Protection Act, 15 U.S.C. § 1125 ef seg., grants this Court statutory in rem jurisdiction over the defendant domain names. R. & R. at 7-10 (Dkt. 38). It is worth adding that, because the defendant res is located in this District, see id. at 10-11, exercising in rem jurisdiction poses no constitutional problem. See Porsche Cars N. Am., Inc. v. Porsche.net, 302 F.3d 248, 259-60 (4th Cir. 2002). It is further ORDERED that default judgment is ENTERED in favor of Plaintiff and against Defendants on the Complaint. It is further ORDERED that Verisign, Inc., as the registry for the following domain names, are DIRECTED to change the registrar of record for the domain names <accesaudi.com>, <aces- saudi.com>, and <knowmyvw.com> to GoDaddy, Inc. It is further ORDERED that GoDaddy, Inc., is DIRECTED to take all necessary steps to list Plaintiff as the registrant for the domain names <accesaudi.com>, <acessaudi.com>, and <knowmyvw.com>. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter Rule 58 judgment against Defendants and in favor of Plaintiff. The Clerk is further directed to provide a copy of this Order to all counsel of record, to Defendants’ last known addresses of record, and to place this matter among the ended causes. Alexandria, Virginia December 14, 2023 TS. Ellis, 1 Senior ed States District Judge

        Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.