JudgeFinder

Anderson v. Sodexo, Inc.

Docket 1:23-cv-01177

Filed
2023-08-07
Terminated
2023-09-19
Case type
cv

Outcome

voluntarily dismissed

FJC civil IDB DISTRICT=72 OFFICE=1 DOCKET=2301177 FILEDATE=08/07/2023 DISP=12, PROCPROG=10, JUDGMENT=0; codebook: https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default/files/idb/codebooks/Civil%20Codebook%201988%20Forward%2010252023.pdf

Outcome source

Parties and representation

      Party and firm records are not available for this case.

      Panel

        No sourced panel votes are recorded.

        Opinions and documents

        1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAMES ANDERSON, No. 1:23-cv-01177-ADA-SKO 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO CLOSE THE CASE 14 SODEXO, INC., et al., (Doc. 3) 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 On September 18, 2023, the parties filed a joint stipulation dismissing the action with 19 prejudice. (Doc. 3.) In light of the parties’ stipulation, this action has been terminated, see Fed. R. 20 Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been 21 dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. 22 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Dated: September 19, 2023 /s/ Sheila K. Oberto . 25 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 26 27 28

        Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.