1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10 | JANE DOE #6, Case No. 1:23-cv-01339-ADA-SAB
11 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT
TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE
12 v. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY
DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41 (a)
13 | STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE
14 Defendants.
(ECF No. 11)
15
16 On November 9, 2023, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with prejudice and
17 | with each party to bear its own costs and fees. (ECF No. 11.) In light of the stipulation of the
18 | parties, this action has been terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San
19 | Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice and without an
20 | award of costs or attorneys’ fees.
21 Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this
22 | case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule (a).
23
24 IT IS SO ORDERED. AA Bc
25 | Dated: _ November 13, 2023
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
26
27
28
Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.