UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF MAINE
GLORIA LYNN SKILLINGS, )
) Civil Action No. 1:23-cv-00217-GZS
Plaintiff, )
)
v. )
)
KILOLO KIJAKAZI, )
Acting Commissioner of Social Security, )
)
Defendant. )
ORDER
Pursuant to the power of this Court to award fees and expenses to a prevailing party other
than the United States incurred by that party in a civil action against the United States, including
proceedings for judicial review of agency action, under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28
U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(A), and in light of this Court’s October 2, 2023 Order and Judgment
remanding this case to the defendant Acting Commissioner for further administrative
proceedings,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the United States Social Security Administration shall
pay attorney’s fees in the amount of four thousand eight-hundred eighty-eight dollars ($4,888.00)
in full satisfaction of any and all attorney’s fee and expenses claims Plaintiff may have in this
case under the Equal Access to Justice Act.
Pursuant to the United States Supreme Court’s ruling in Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586
(2010), these attorney’s fees are payable to Plaintiff as the prevailing party, and are subject to
offset through the Treasury Department’s Offset Program to satisfy any pre-existing debt
Plaintiff may owe to the government. If, subsequent to the entry of this Order, the
Commissioner determines that Plaintiff owes no debt to the government that would subject this
award of attorney’s fees to offset, the Commissioner may honor Plaintiff’s May 13, 2023 signed
assignment of EAJA fees providing for payment of the subject fees to Plaintiff’s counsel, rather
than to Plaintiff. If, however, Plaintiff is discovered to owe the government any debt subject to
offset, the Commissioner may pay any attorney’s fees remaining after such offset to Plaintiff
rather than to counsel.
SO ORDERED this 7th day of November, 2023.
/s/ George Z. Singal
U.S. District Judge
Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.