Murphy v. Commissioner of Social Security

Docket 8:22-cv-00805

Filed
2022-04-05
Terminated
2023-01-31
Case type
cv

Outcome

magistrate appeal denied

FJC civil IDB DISTRICT=3A OFFICE=8 DOCKET=2200805 FILEDATE=04/05/2022 DISP=20, PROCPROG=4, JUDGMENT=0; codebook: https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default/files/idb/codebooks/Civil%20Codebook%201988%20Forward%2010252023.pdf

Outcome source

Parties and representation

      Party and firm records are not available for this case.

      Panel

        No sourced panel votes are recorded.

        Opinions and documents

        UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA TAMPA DIVISION ANGELINA KAY MURPHY, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 8:22-cv-805-MAP COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY Defendant. / ORDER Before me is Plaintiff’s Unopposed Petition for Award of Attorney Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act (doc. 38). Plaintiff seeks payment of attorney’s fees in the amount of $6,848.31 pursuant to the EAJA.1 On January 30, 2023, I entered an Order remanding Plaintiff’s case to the Commissioner for further administrative proceedings (doc. 36); the Clerk of Court entered judgment in Plaintiff’s favor on the same date (doc. 37).2 1 Attorney Dax J. Lonetto, Sr. requests fees at the hourly rate of $232.67.63 for 23.7 hours of attorney work performed in 2022 and fees at an hourly rate of $238.22 for 5.6 hours of attorney work performed in 2023 (doc. 38 at 3). 2 The plaintiff in a social security case has 30 days beyond the 60-day appeal window to apply for fees and other expenses under the EAJA, for a total of 90 days after judgment. See 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)(1)(B), (d)(2)(G); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(B); Gates v. Barnhart, 325 F. Supp. 2d 1342, 1343 (M.D. Fla. 2002). In this case, Plaintiff timely filed her application for fees on May 1, 2023 (doc. 38). In Reeves v. Astrue, 526 F.3d 732 (11th Cir. 2008), the Eleventh Circuit held that an EAJA fee award is awarded to the “prevailing party,” not to counsel. However, in this case, Plaintiff has agreed to assign the EAJA award to her counsel (doc. 38 at 16). The Commissioner does not oppose Plaintiff's motion. Therefore, by virtue of the fee assignment and Defendant’s lack of opposition, the award is payable to Plaintiff's counsel. Accordingly, it is ORDERED: 1. Plaintiffs Unopposed Petition for Attorney Fees pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (doc. 38) is GRANTED; and 2. Plaintiff is awarded attorney’s fees in the amount of $6,848.31 to be paid directly to Plaintiff's counsel, if Plaintiff does not owe a debt to the Government.’ DONE AND ORDERED at Tampa, Florida on May 5, 2023. MARK A. PIZZO UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 3 The Commissioner will determine whether Plaintiff owes a debt to the government. If she does, fees shall be made payable to Plaintiff and delivered to Plaintiff's counsel to satisfy the debt.

        Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.