Opinions and documents
NOT FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY
LAWRENCE VERLINE WILDER, SR.
Petitioner,
v. Civil Action No. 10-3428 (GC)
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, et al MEMORANDUM & ORDER
Respondents.
CASTNER, District Judge
THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the “Motion to Reopen Case and to Appoint
Pro Bono” (Motion to Reopen and to Appoint Counsel) filed by pro se Petitioner Lawrence Verline
Wilder, Sr. (ECF No. 10.) For the reasons set forth below, the Motion is DENIED without
prejudice because Petitioner has failed to comply with Local Civil Rule 10.1.
On or about July 6, 2010, Petitioner submitted a petition for a writ of habeas corpus
(Petition) and an application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). (ECF Nos. 1, 1-1.)
On January 31, 2011, the Honorable Mary L. Cooper, U.S.D.J. granting Petitioner 30 days
to submit an amended petition that complied with Rule 2 of the § 2254 Habeas Rules by stating
the grounds for relief available to him, the facts supporting the grounds, and the relief he was
requesting. (See ECF No. 3 at 1); Wilder v. New Jersey, No. 10-3428, 2011 WL 317967 (D.N.J.
Jan. 31, 2011). Petitioner was provided with the applicable blank form and given notice that,
should he fail to submit the requisite amended petition within 30 days, the Court would enter an
order without further notice dismissing his Petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2243. (ECF No. 3 at
1.) Petitioner was also ordered to show cause in writing why the Petition should not be dismissed
for failure to satisfy the ‘in custody’ requirement under 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). (Id. at 2.)
On April 11, 2011, Judge Cooper dismissed the Petition without prejudice because
Petitioner submitted neither an amended petition nor a response to the order to show cause. (ECF
No. 4 at 1-2.) Furthermore, Judge Cooper directed the Clerk of the Court to mark this matter
closed. (Id.)
On December 7, 2015, Petitioner filed a submission docketed as a “Motion to Appoint
Effective Counsel” and entitled “Rule 60 Motion Writ of Habeas Corpus Motion to Appoint
Effective Counsel.” (ECF No. 6.) According to the envelope, the submission was sent from:
Lawrence Wilder Sr
1101 Chestnut Street
Wilmington, NC 28401
(Id. at 33.)
On August 10, 2016, Judge Cooper directed the Clerk to reopen this matter, construed
Petitioner’s August 10, 2016 motion as a motion to reopen, denied the motion to reopen, and
ordered the Clerk of the Court to mark this matter closed. (ECF No. 7 at 1-2; ECF No. 8 at 1.)
On or about January 15, 2025,1 Petitioner filed the pending Motion to Reopen and to
Appoint Counsel. According to the envelope and Petitioner’s declaration of mailing/filing,
Petitioner was confined at the Lumberton Correctional Institution in Lumberton, North Carolina.
(ECF No. 10 at 14-15.)
The Honorable Renee Marie Bumb, U.S.C.D.J., entered a text order on January 28, 2025
reassigning this matter from Judge Cooper to the Undersigned. (ECF No. 9.) On March 11, 2025,
1 See Burns v. Morton, 134 F.3d 109, 113 (3d Cir. 1998) (holding that a pro se prisoner’s
habeas petition is deemed filed at the moment he delivers it to prison officials for mailing to the
district court).
an ECF notice of electronic filing mailed to Petitioner’s Wilmington, North Carolina address was
returned as undeliverable. (ECF No. 11.) The “Return to Sender” label indicates that the addressee
moved and left no address and that the mailing could not be forwarded. (Id. at 1.)
On April 1, 2025, the Clerk received a submission from Petitioner, which was mailed from
the Lumberton Correctional Institution and docketed as an “Offender Request Information Form.”
(ECF No. 12 at 2-3.)
A search of the North Carolina Department of Adult Correction Offender Public
Information Database indicates that Petitioner was paroled from the Lumberton Correctional
Institution on June 2, 2025.2 Petitioner has not contacted the Court to provide an updated address.
Local Civil Rule 10.1(a) provides, in relevant part:
[U]nrepresented parties must advise the Court of any change in their
. . . address within seven days of being apprised of such change by
filing a notice of said change with the Clerk. Failure to file a notice
of change may result in the imposition of sanctions by the Court.
Dismissing a complaint without prejudice is an appropriate remedy for noncompliance with this
rule. See Archie v. Dep’t of Corr., No. 12-2466, 2015 WL 333299, at *1 (D.N.J. Jan. 23, 2015).
Failure to provide an updated address within 30 days of the date of this Order may result in
dismissal of this matter for lack of prosecution.
IT IS, therefore, on this 7th day of August, 2025, ORDERED as follows:
1. The Clerk of the Court shall REOPEN this matter to permit this Court to decide
Petitioner’s Motion to Reopen and to Appoint Counsel (ECF No. 10).
2. Petitioner’s Motion to Reopen and to Appoint Counsel (ECF No. 10) is DENIED
2 North Carolina Department of Adult Correction, Offender Information, available at
https://webapps.doc.state.nc.us/opi/viewoffender.do?method=view&offenderID=1471620&searc
hLastName=Wilder&searchFirstName=Lawrence&searchDOBRange=0&listurl=pagelistoffende
rsearchresults&listpage=1 (Offender Number 1471620) (last visited Aug. 6, 2025).
without prejudice under Local Civil Rule 10.1(a).
3. The Clerk of the Court shall TERMINATE the Motion pending at ECF No. 10.
4. The Clerk of the Court shall ADMINISTRATIVELY TERMINATE this matter for
failure to comply with Local Civil Rule 10.1(a), without prejudice.
5. If Petitioner wishes to reopen this case, he shall so notify the Court, in a writing
addressed to the Clerk of the Court, Clarkson S. Fisher Building & U.S. Courthouse,
402 East State Street, Trenton, NJ 08608, within 30 days of the date of entry of this
Order; Petitioner’s writing shall show good cause why he did not timely apprise the
Court of his new address.
6. Failure to comply with this Order may result in the matter being dismissed for lack of
prosecution.
7. The Clerk of the Court shall serve a copy of this Order upon Petitioner by regular U.S.
mail at his last known address (Lawrence Verline Wilder 1471620 (Kitchen),
Lumberton Correctional Institution, 75 Legend Road, Lumberton, NC 28358).
Gage Ch anther
GEORGETTE CASTNER
United States District Judge
Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.