UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
MIDDLE DISTRICT OF FLORIDA
OCALA DIVISION
GARY ALAN SIMMONS,
Plaintiff,
v. Case No: 5:21-cv-47-GKS-PRL
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL
SECURITY,
Defendant.
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION1
The Commissioner has filed an unopposed motion to remand this case for further
proceedings under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). (Doc. 24). The Commissioner states
that on remand, the Commissioner will “further evaluate the claimant’s fibromyalgia
pursuant to SSR 12-2p; reassess the opinion evidence from the State agency psychological
consultants; reconsider the claimant’s residual functional capacity; and if warranted, obtain
supplemental vocational evidence.”
Pursuant to Title 42, United States Code, Section 405(g) the Court is empowered to
reverse the decision of the Commissioner with or without remanding the cause for a
rehearing. Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296 (1993). Where the court cannot discern the
basis for the Commissioner’s decision, a sentence-four remand may be appropriate to allow
him to explain the basis for his decision. Falcon v. Heckler, 732 F.2d 827, 829-30 (11th Cir.
1 Within 14 days after being served with a copy of the recommended disposition, a party may
file written objections to the Report and Recommendation’s factual findings and legal conclusions.
See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3); Fed. R. Crim. P. 59(b)(2); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). A party’s failure to
file written objections waives that party’s right to challenge on appeal any unobjected-to factual finding
or legal conclusion the district judge adopts from the Report and Recommendation. See 11th Cir. R.
3-1.
1984) (holding remand was appropriate to allow the ALJ to explain the basis for the
determination that the claimant’s depression did not significantly affect her ability to work).
On remand under sentence four, the ALJ should review the case on a complete record,
including any new material evidence. Diorio v. Heckler, 721 F.2d 726, 729 (11th Cir. 1983)
(finding that it was necessary for the ALJ on remand to consider psychiatric report tendered
to Appeals Council); Reeves v. Heckler, 734 F.2d 519, 522 n. 1 (11th Cir. 1984) (holding that
the ALJ should consider on remand the need for an orthopedic evaluation).
Therefore, following a careful review of the record and filings, the Court agrees with
the parties that it is appropriate to remand this matter to the Commissioner. Accordingly, it
is RECOMMENDED that:
(1) Commissioner’s unopposed motion for entry of judgment with remand (Doc.
24) be GRANTED and this action be REVERSED AND REMANDED
pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g)2 to the Commissioner for the
following reasons:
Upon remand, the Appeals Council will instruct the ALJ to obtain
supplemental evidence from a vocational expert (VE), clarifying any conflicts
between the testimony of the VE and the Dictionary of Occupational Titles,
and articulating any such conflicts in the decision; to offer the claimant the
opportunity for a hearing; to take any further action needed to complete the
administrative record; and to issue a new decision.
(2) The Clerk should also be directed to enter judgment accordingly and close the
file.
Recommended in Ocala, Florida on November 22, 2021.
2 Remand pursuant to sentence four of § 405(g) makes the plaintiff a prevailing party for
purposes of the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. § 2412, and terminates this Court's jurisdiction
over this matter. Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292 (1993).
PHILIP R. LAMMENS
United States Magistrate Judge
Copies furnished to:
Presiding District Judge
Counsel of Record
Unrepresented Party
Courtroom Deputy
Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.