1
2
3
4
5
6
7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
10 PAIGE T., Case No.: 20cv2456-MDD
11 Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING JOINT
12 v. MOTION FOR THE AWARD AND
PAYMENT OF ATTORNEY FEES
13 KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Acting
AND EXPENSES PURSUANT TO
Commissioner of Social Security,
14 THE EQUAL ACCESS TO
Defendant. JUSTICE ACT, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d)
15
AND COSTS PURSUANT TO 28
16 U.S.C. § 1920
17
[ECF No. 19]
18
19 On December 16, 2020, Plaintiff Paige T. filed this Social Security
20 appeal challenging the denial of her application for disability insurance
21 benefits. (ECF No. 1). On March 25, 2022, the Court granted the parties’
22 joint motion for voluntary remand, pursuant to sentence four of 42 USC §
23 405(g), and judgment was entered in favor of Plaintiff, and against
24 Defendant, reversing the final decision of the Commissioner. (ECF Nos. 17-
25 18). The parties now stipulate to an award to Plaintiff of attorney’s fees and
26 expenses in the amount of $4,402.00 under the Equal Access to Justice Act
1 A prevailing party may seek attorney’s fees from the United States
9 ||under the EAJA within thirty days of final judgment. 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d).
3 ||“A sentence four remand becomes a final judgment, for purposes of attorneys’
4 ||fees claims brought pursuant to the EAJA, 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), upon
5 ||expiration of the time for appeal.” Akopyan v. Barnhart, 296 F.3d 852, 854
6 || (9th Cir. 2002). If one of the parties is the United States, either party may
7 a notice of appeal within sixty days of the judgment or order appealed
8 ||from. See Fed. R. App. 4(a)(1)(B). “A plaintiff who obtains a sentence four
9 ||remand is considered a prevailing party for purposes of attorneys’ fees.”
10 Akopyan, 296 F.3d at 854. Therefore, Plaintiff is the prevailing party in this
11 action for purposes of attorney’s fees, the parties’ joint motion is timely, and
12 ||the Court finds the stipulated amount of fees and expenses to be reasonable.
13 Accordingly, the Court GRANTS the joint motion and AWARDS
14 || Plaintiff attorney’s fees and expenses in the total amount of $4,402.00. Fees
15 || will be made payable to Paige T., but if the Department of the Treasury
16 determines that Paige T. does not owe a federal debt, then the government
17 || will cause the payment of fees, expenses, and costs to be made directly to the
18 Law Offices of Lawrence D. Rohlfing, Inc., CPC, pursuant to the assignment
19 ||}executed by Paige T. Any payments shall be delivered to Monica Perales.
20 IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 30, 2022 □□□ +L s | [>
Hon. Mitchell D. Dembin
23 United States Magistrate Judge
24
25
26
27
Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.