Owens v. Commissioner Social Security Administration

Docket 3:20-cv-00726

Filed
2020-05-01
Terminated
2021-06-01
Case type
cv

Outcome

remanded to U.S. agency

FJC civil IDB DISTRICT=79 OFFICE=3 DOCKET=2000726 FILEDATE=05/01/2020 DISP=11, PROCPROG=4, JUDGMENT=0; codebook: https://www.fjc.gov/sites/default/files/idb/codebooks/Civil%20Codebook%201988%20Forward%2010252023.pdf

Outcome source

Parties and representation

      Party and firm records are not available for this case.

      Panel

        No sourced panel votes are recorded.

        Opinions and documents

        Bruce W. Brewer, OSB No. 925581 brucebrewerusdccases@gmail.com PO Box 421 West Linn, OR 97068 Phone: 503-621-6633 Attorney for Plaintiff UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON ALAN OWENS, Case No. 3:20-cv-00726-AC Plaintiff, ORDER Vs. COMMISSIONER, of Social Security Administration, Defendant. Plaintiff prevailed, the parties have stipulated to this fee, and it is therefore ORDERED that Defendant shall pay Plaintiff an attorney fee under the Equal Access to Justice Act in the amount of $6,565.84, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2412. Defendant is further ORDERED to pay the fee directly to Plaintiff's attorney by check made payable to Bruce Brewer and to send the check to him at PO Box 421, West Linn, OR 97068, unless Plaintiff has debt which qualifies for offset against the awarded fees pursuant to the Treasury Offset Program as discussed in Astrue v. Ratliff, 560 U.S. 586 (2010). If Plaintiff has such debt then the check for any remaining funds ORDER FOR EAJA FEE - 1 after offset of the debt shall be made payable to Plaintiff and mailed to Plaintiff's attorney's office at the address stated above. There are no costs or expenses to be paid herein. Order signed July 7 —_—s—« 2021. { ON i CA The Honorable‘John V. Acosta United St tog District Court Magistrate Judge Prepared by: Bruce Brewer OSB #925581 PO Box 421 West Linn, OR 97068 503-621-6633 ORDER FOR EAJA FEE - 2

        Not legal advice. These patterns come from public court records, not ratings of judges as people. They may reflect the types of cases a judge handles, local procedures or other factors, and they do not account for the facts of any individual case. Past patterns do not predict future rulings. Records can be incomplete, months behind current activity, or matched to the wrong person; sealed and confidential cases are not included. Use this as one piece of information, never the sole basis for legal strategy or a recusal motion. Full disclaimer: https://judgefinder.io/legal/disclaimer Read the full disclaimer.